ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
ACOUSTIC PARAMETER COMBINATIONS UNDERLYING MAPPING OF AUDITORY PSEUDOWORD SOUNDS TO MULTIPLE DOMAINS OF MEANING: A MACHINE LEARNING APPROACH.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sound symbolism, referring to the resemblance between the sound structure of words and their meaning, is commonly studied using auditory pseudowords. Companion studies across seven meaning domains demonstrated systematic relationships, varying by domain, between the perceptual ratings, phonetic features, and acoustic parameters of a set of 537 pseudowords (Lacey et al. 2024a, 2024b). Here we employed a k-nearest-neighbor (KNN) machine-learning algorithm to compare 4094 combinations of twelve acoustic parameters (3 spectro-temporal and 9 characterizing vocal quality) and identify the parameter combination that best predicted perceptual ratings in each domain. Using multiple regression, we then examined the relative contributions of the parameters comprising the best performing acoustic model for each domain. Finally, we used the KNN approach to generate sound-symbolic ratings, in the shape domain, for 160 real words and compared these predicted ratings with corresponding perceptual ratings. We found that sound-symbolic mappings rely on domain-specific combinations and weights of acoustic parameters. One spectro-temporal parameter, the fast Fourier transform, and one vocal parameter, the fraction of unvoiced frames, were both present in the best performing model for each meaning domain studied, indicating the general importance of these two parameters for sound-symbolic judgments. The predicted and perceptual ratings of the real words were strongly correlated, indicating the value of this approach to measure the degree of sound-symbolic mapping in natural languages, unconfounded by semantic bias. Our findings support the proposed relevance of sound symbolism to language.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.