ArticleJournal of microscopy and ultrastructure
Orthokeratinized Odontogenic Keratocyst: Report of Nine Cases with Review of Literature.
Article in Journal of microscopy and ultrastructure. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- How uncommon is the occurrence of orthokeratinized odontogenic cyst in the maxilla? A systematic review and a new case report.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Formerly believed to be a subtype of odontogenic keratocyst (OKC), orthokeratinized odontogenic cyst (OOC), a rare developing odontogenic cyst, is now believed to be distinct. The clinical, radiographic, histological data are included in this report, along with a review of the literature to aid in comprehending the cyst. A retrospective search in the oral pathology department between 2018 and 2022 was conducted to recover all cases reported as OOC in SRM Dental College, Ramapuram. Radiographs and Haematoxylin and Eosin stained histological slides were re-examined. Overall, there were nine cases in which men were engaged in 80% of the instances and the group's ages varied from 20 to 35. The primary symptoms of all of the patients were pain and edema. The vast majority of cases had an impacted tooth in the jaw. All of the lesions showed clearly visible radiolucency on orthopantomographs [OPG], with the exception of one specific case. Additionally, histological examination of each patient revealed the characteristic microscopic traits and enucleation was done to treat all the cases. OOC has a more favourable outcome than OKC due to variations in prognosis, management and must be considered distinct from OKC. Most of our cases-a large majority-involved adolescent males' mandibles and involved pain and edema. Most were unilocular and all were radiolucent. The literature-recommended histopathological findings were present and all cases were enucleated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.