ArticleJournal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology
Comparison of caudal bupivacaine and dexmedetomidine with caudal bupivacaine and intravenous dexmedetomidine for postoperative analgesia in children: A randomized controlled trial.
Article in Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Caudal block is a part of multimodal analgesic regimen to alleviate pain in pediatric patients undergoing variety of surgeries. This study compares the effectiveness of caudal versus intravenous dexmedetomidine as an additive to caudal bupivacaine for prolonging analgesia in children posted for elective lower abdominal surgeries. The level of sedation and hemodynamic effects through both routes were also compared. Material and Methods: Ninety-six children (aged 1-8 years) of either gender scheduled for elective lower abdominal and pelvic surgeries were prospectively enrolled and randomized into two groups of 48 each: Group A (caudal bupivacaine + caudal dexmedetomidine) and Group B (caudal bupivacaine + intravenous dexmedetomidine). The postoperative pain was monitored using the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) scale, and sedation was assessed using the Ramsay sedation scale (RSS). Results: The degree of analgesia was comparable in both groups in the initial hours after surgery. Significantly higher FLACC scores were seen in Group B at 8 h ( Conclusion: Caudal dexmedetomidine with bupivacaine provides improved analgesia after 8 h of surgery in comparison to caudal bupivacaine with intravenous dexmedetomidine in children undergoing lower abdominal surgeries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.