Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40635811›Full record

ReviewJournal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology

Sacral erector spinae block: A new era for postoperative analgesia-a narrative review.

Teena Bansal, Suresh Singhal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Teena BansalDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Pt. B D Sharma University of Health Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India.
Suresh SinghalDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Pt. B D Sharma University of Health Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Erector spinae muscle extends throughout the cervical, thoracic, lumbar and sacral regions. Sacral erector spinae block is performed by depositing the local anaesthetic in the fascial plane deep to erector spinae muscle at sacral level. Local anaesthetic gets distributed in craniocaudal fascial plane and exerts its effect on ventral and dorsal rami of spinal nerves. Block at sacral level provides excellent postoperative analgesia. This block has been used as a sole anaesthetic technique as well. The rationale and focus of this narrative view are to provide an overview of the effectiveness and indications of sacral erector spinae block in addition to techniques used for this block. Sacral erector spinae block provides many advantages. It covers many dermatomes using longitudinal midline technique. It is safe as it is a superficial block. The block does not cause hypotension and bradycardia, hence there is no haemodynamic instability. The block is an excellent modality for postoperative analgesia, chronic pain relief as well as surgical anaesthesia. It works effectively for both children as well as adults and can prove a new era for postoperative analgesia in future.

Indexed as

Analgesiaerector spinae musclelocal anestheticsacral

Identifiers

PMID40635811
PMCPMC12237285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.