Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40635773›Full record

ArticleBiodiversity data journal2025

Fragmented Networks: Challenges in communication and cohesion of European Biodiversity Research Infrastructures.

Allan T Souza, Tomáš Martinovič, Carrie Andrew, Yi-Ming Gan, Erik Kusch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biodiversity data journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Allan T SouzaInstitute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research INAR, Forest Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research INAR, Forest Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1851-681X
Tomáš MartinovičIT4Innovations, VSB - Technical University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic IT4Innovations, VSB - Technical University of Ostrava Ostrava Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0132-1434
Carrie AndrewNatural History Museum, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway Natural History Museum, University of Oslo Oslo Norway.
Yi-Ming GanRoyal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Brussels, Belgium Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences Brussels Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7087-2646
Erik KuschUniversity of Oslo, Oslo, Norway University of Oslo Oslo Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4984-7646

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

European Biodiversity Research Infrastructures (BioRIs) play a central role in addressing the complex challenges in biodiversity research, scientific collaboration across disciplines and national boundaries, as well as informing the public and policy-makers about the status and challenges of the European biodiversity. Our study focuses on the communication and coordination amongst BioRIs and revealed important fragmentation in communication strategies both within and across the key European BioRIs - including DiSSCo (Distributed System of Scientific Collections), eLTER (Integrated European Long-Term Ecosystem Research), GBIF (Global Biodiversity Information Facility) and LifeWatch ERIC. This fragmentation manifests in uneven geographical representation, inconsistent communication practices and limited data and service cohesion, ultimately impeding collaboration and the efficient use of resources. While some initiatives to tackle this issue demonstrate the potential for harmonisation, the the broader systemic challenges still persist. We argue that overcoming these barriers will require the development of standardised communication frameworks, more equitable distribution of infrastructures and deeper understanding of domain-specific differences that currently hinder the interoperability. Our study demonstrates the urgent need for coordinated efforts to integrate European BioRIs into a more coherent and accessible research ecosystem capable of addressing the biodiversity challenges of the 21

Indexed as

biodiversityBioDTDigital TwinDiSSCoeLTERGBIFLifeWatch ERIC

Identifiers

PMID40635773
PMCPMC12238962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.