ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Association of morphine vs. fentanyl prescription dispensation with adverse clinical outcomes.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrated pharmacovigilance of fentanyl: multinational analysis reveals novel safety signals and demographic-specific risk profiles.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The aim was to assess the associations between morphine, fentanyl and adverse events in primary care patients. Methods: A retrospective, propensity-score-weighted cohort study using a primary-care database covering >75% population of Catalonia, Spain was conducted. Patients aged ≥18 years with ≥1 year of available data and incident dispensation of morphine or fentanyl, were included from 1st January 2007 to 31st December 2017. Outcomes were all-cause mortality, cardiac arrhythmias, fractures (hip, pelvis, vertebra, wrist, humerus), constipation, delirium, falls, opioid abuse/dependence, and sleep disorders while on treatment. Risk ratios (RRs) and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using cause-specific Cox models. Results: A total of 12,632 patients (3,040 with morphine and 9,695 with fentanyl) were included (median [IQR] age, 78.4 [63.8; 86.1] years; 63.6% female). Compared with morphine, fentanyl dispensation was associated with a higher risk of fractures (incidence: 6.92 vs. 4.13 per 1,000 dispensations-month; HR, 1.63 [95% CI, 1.15-2.32]; RR, 1.78 [95% CI, 1.25-2.53]), especially in men and in those <65 and over >80 years old. No difference was observed for the rest of outcomes. Conclusion: Among outpatients, a new prescription dispensation of fentanyl, compared with morphine, was associated with a higher risk of fractures. The findings should be interpreted cautiously given the potential for residual confounding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.