Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40635736›Full record

ReviewJournal of research in pharmacy practice

The Role of Systemic Antibiotics in Preventing Ventilator-associated Pneumonia in Intensive Care Unit Patients: Insights from a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Niloofar Etemad, Koorosh Etemad, Shadi Farsaei, Azadeh Moghaddas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of research in pharmacy practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Niloofar EtemadDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Practice, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Koorosh EtemadDepartment of Epidemiology, Faculty of Public Health and Safety, Promotion and Injury Prevention Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Shadi FarsaeiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Isfahan Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, Faculty of Pharmacy, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Azadeh MoghaddasDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Practice, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effectiveness of prophylactic systemic antibiotics in preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) in intensive care units (ICUs) remains uncertain. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in reducing the incidence of VAP among the IMV population. We conducted an extensive search of databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, from their inception to December 2023. We aimed to identify studies evaluating the effects of prophylactic systemic antibiotics on VAP, early- and late-onset VAP, mortality rates, median ventilation days, and lengths of ICU and hospital stays, facilitating a comprehensive meta-analysis. Seven studies involving 939 patients indicated that the use of preventive antibiotics reduced VAP compared to control groups (risk ratio [RR] of 0.61). The early-onset VAP rate was also lower in the treatment group compared to the control groups (RR of 0.40). Prophylactic systemic antibiotics may effectively reduce VAP incidence in ICU patients on IMV but do not significantly impact other clinical outcomes. These findings may stem from the fact that VAP accounts for a small fraction of ICU deaths, and most studies focused on early-onset VAP, which has lower mortality. However, definitive recommendations cannot be established without the necessity of well-designed randomized controlled trials.

Indexed as

Antibiotic prophylaxismeta-analysisventilator-associated pneumonia

Identifiers

PMID40635736
PMCPMC12237149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.