ReviewFrontiers in neurology2025
Evaluating predictive models for hemorrhagic transformation post-mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke.
Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Machine Learning Models in Predicting Functional Outcome of Thrombectomy for Acute Posterior Circulation Artery Occlusion: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical neuroradiology · 2026Pooled it
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute ischemic stroke (AIS), a condition defined by a decrease in cerebral blood flow, is primarily treated through mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for blockages in major anterior circulation arteries. Approaches encompass stent retrieval, suction thrombectomy, or a combination of both. MT is increasingly recognized for its rapid revascularization, low hemorrhagic transformation (HT) rate, and extended therapeutic time window. Nonetheless, multiple risk factors lead to post-MT HT through different mechanisms, resulting in adverse outcomes such as increased mortality and morbidity. Therefore, assessing the relevant risks based on predictive models for post-MT HT is necessary. These predictive models incorporate a series of risk factors and conduct statistical analyses to generate corresponding assessment scales, which are then used to evaluate the risk of postoperative bleeding. As this is a rapidly developing field, there is still controversy over which model is more effective than another in improving clinical efficacy, and there is a lack of consensus on the comparison of these data. In this paper, we assess the accuracy of these predictive models using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the concordance C-index. Determining the most accurate predictive model for post-MT HT is crucial for improving the prediction of patient outcomes and for the development of tailored treatment plans, thereby enhancing clinical relevance and applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.