ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Efficacy of argatroban plus alteplase according to time from onset to thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke: a prespecified
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03740958 (Argatroban Plus R-tPA for Acute Ischemic Stroke), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Argatroban Plus R-tPA for Acute Ischemic Stroke: a Prospective, Random, Open Label, Blinded Assessment of Outcome Multi-center Study
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Argatroban Plus Recombinant Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator for AIS (ARAIS) trial failed to demonstrate the benefit of argatroban in patients diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke who were treated with intravenous alteplase. A Methods: The included patients were classified into two subgroups according to OTT. The primary outcome was an excellent functional outcome at 90 days, defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 or 1. The efficacy of argatroban plus alteplase was investigated in each subgroup compared with alteplase alone. Results: Overall, 696 patients were included: 452 were assigned to the OTT < 180 min subgroup, and 244 to the OTT ≥ 180 min subgroup. The treatment effect of argatroban plus alteplase was similar to that of alteplase alone in the OTT < 180 min subgroup (adjusted RD [95% CI] = 0.5% [-5.6 to 6.6%]) and OTT ≥ 180 min subgroup (adjusted RD [95% CI] = -1.3% [-9.8 to 7.1%]). No significant interaction between the treatment efficacy and OTT was found ( Interpretation: The prespecified secondary analysis indicated that the efficacy of argatroban plus alteplase did not differ according to OTT in terms of achieving 90-day excellent functional outcomes compared with alteplase alone. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT03740958.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.