ReviewExpert review of proteomics2025
The evolution of analytical techniques for multiplex analysis of protein biomarkers.
Review in Expert review of proteomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The good, the bad, and the ugly: opportunities, challenges, and pitfalls in spatial proteomics modeling.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Analysis of Proteins and Peptides by Electrokinetic Stacking Coupled with Paper Spray Mass Spectrometry.Analytical chemistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe landscape of biomarker development has evolved with advanced analytical technologies, particularly affinity- and mass spectrometry-based techniques. These advancements have deepened our understanding of disease mechanisms, enabling the development of precise diagnostic tools and personalized medicine. Protein biomarkers, which play pivotal roles in biological processes, have become invaluable in diagnosing and monitoring diseases, aided by their presence in various biological samples and the availability of established detection methods. AREAS COVERED: This review covers the role of protein biomarkers in clinical practice, the development and dimensionality of protein biomarkers, advancements in detection technologies, a comparison of these technologies, and future directions in biomarker discovery and disease mechanism elucidation. EXPERT OPINION: Advances in biomarker technologies have the potential to transform diagnostics and personalized treatment but face challenges such as high costs and technical complexity. Enhancing reproducibility and integrating multi-omics approaches may offer better insights. The field should evolve toward high-throughput, automated methods, continuously adapting research, and clinical practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.