Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40635619›Full record

ArticleWork (Reading, Mass.)2025

Testing the feasibility of 30 min of daily outdoor office work for stress management: A pilot study.

Per Andreasson, Susanna Toivanen, Feben Javan Abraham, Katarina Bälter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Work (Reading, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Per AndreassonSchool of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Division of Psychology, Mälardalen University, Eskilstuna, Sweden.ORCID 0009-0000-9755-076X
Susanna ToivanenSchool of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Division of Sociology, Mälardalen University, Västerås, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-3965-1666
Feben Javan AbrahamSchool of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Division of Public Health Sciences, Mälardalen University, Västerås, Sweden.
Katarina BälterSchool of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Division of Public Health Sciences, Mälardalen University, Västerås, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-2046-5641

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundPerceived stress in the workplace is a growing concern, with modern office environments often contributing through noise, crowding, and lack of privacy. To support office workers' well-being and recovery during the workday, new ways of working-such as spending time outdoors-are being explored.ObjectiveThis explorative pilot study aims to investigate whether engaging in at least 30 min of outdoor office work each day for five consecutive working days could reduce self-rated stress levels among office workers.MethodsA within-subjects design was employed. During the first week, eight participants followed their regular office routine. In the second week, the same participants were instructed to spend a minimum of 30 min each day performing office work outdoors.ResultsIn the second week, participants worked outdoors for an average of 322 min per week (≈64 min/day), primarily in urban nature settings. Self-rated stress levels were 15% lower than in the first week, a statistically significant reduction by paired-sample t-test, though not by the Wilcoxon test.ConclusionsDaily outdoor work is feasible among office workers and may reduce self-rated stress levels, warranting larger studies with more diverse participants and environments.

Indexed as

Occupational StressStress, PsychologicalWorkplaceAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsSurveys and QuestionnairesTime Factorsenvironmental psychologyhealth promotionoccupational healthoccupational stresspilot projectsworking conditions

Identifiers

PMID40635619
PMCPMC12669386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.