Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40635607›Full record

Observational studyThe journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research2025

Changes in proportions of Cesarean section before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan.

Kensuke Shimada, Jun Komiyama, Takehiro Sugiyama, Shin Jung-Ho, Tomomi Kihara, Rie Masuda, Susumu Kunisawa, Masao Iwagami, Isao Muraki, Yuichi Imanaka and 2 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Kensuke ShimadaGraduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Jun KomiyamaDepartment of Health Services Research, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3125-9168
Takehiro SugiyamaDepartment of Health Services Research, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Shin Jung-HoDepartment of Healthcare Economics and Quality Management, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Tomomi KiharaDepartment of Public Health Medicine, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Rie MasudaDepartment of Health Services Research, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Susumu KunisawaDepartment of Healthcare Economics and Quality Management, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Masao IwagamiDepartment of Health Services Research, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Isao MurakiDepartment of Social and Environmental Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Yuichi ImanakaDepartment of Healthcare Economics and Quality Management, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Hiroyasu IsoInstitute for Global Health Policy Research, Bureau of Global Health Cooperation, Japan Institute for Health Seculity, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3165-6005
Nanako TamiyaDepartment of Health Services Research, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.

Funding

Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare JPMH23 HA2011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimAfter the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, Cesarean sections for COVID-19-positive cases were performed to reduce delivery time and thus control infection. This may have increased the proportion of Cesarean sections and affected many pregnant women in Japan; though this expected trend has not yet been quantified. This study examined changes in the proportions of Cesarean sections in Japan before and during the pandemic.

methodsThis study retrospective observational study used the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan and Vital Statistics from the National Statistical Surveys from April 2018 to October 2022. We compared proportions of Cesarean sections (total Cesarean sections/total live births) in Japan before and during the pandemic and by the COVID-19 pandemic phase: pre-COVID-19 (April 2018 to December 2019), Wave 1 (January to May 2020), Wave 2 (June to October 2020), Wave 3 (November 2020 to February 2021), Wave 4 (March to June 2021), Wave 5 (July to December 2021), Wave 6 (January to June 2022), and Wave 7 (July to October 2022).

resultsThe proportion of Cesarean sections in Japan was 20.27% (317 241/1 564 912) before the pandemic and increased to 21.19% (486 172/2 294 488) during the pandemic. The highest proportion was in Wave 6 (22.14%), dropping to 21.27% in Wave 7.

conclusionThe overall proportion of Cesarean sections increased by 0.92% point during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan, possibly due in part to infection control measures. Verification and preparation are necessary to respond to future pandemics.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionCOVID-19AdultFemaleHumansJapanPregnancyRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Cesarean sectioncoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19)Japan, National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan (NDB)mode of delivery

Identifiers

PMID40635607
PMCPMC12242368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.