ArticleTechnology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine2025
Risk factors of acute myocardial infarction combined with First-Diagnosed atrial fibrillation.
Article in Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It carries an expression of concern. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Expression of concern
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BackgroundAtrial fibrillation (AF) is a common complication of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), significantly affecting patient prognosis by increasing the risk of heart failure, thromboembolic events, and mortality.ObjectiveTo explore the risk factors of AM combined with first-diagnosed AF.MethodsClinical data related to a total of 142 consecutive AMI patients admitted to Beijing Tongren Hospital from January 1, 2020 to May 1, 2020 were retrospectively analyzed, of whom 8 cases (5.6%) were divided into first-diagnosed AF group and the rest 134 cases were in non-first-diagnosed AF group according to the presence or absence of first-diagnosed AF. Clinical data, laboratory indexes, cardiac ultrasonography and coronary angiography results of the two groups were compared. Logistic regression method was used to analyze the possible risk factors offirst-diagnosed AF.ResultsComparing the various data between the two groups, the peak creatinine kinase myocardial band (CKMB), white blood cell count, left ventricular ejection fraction, and the proportion of patients with admission Killip grades 3-4 in the first-diagnosed AF group were significantly different from those in the non- first-diagnosed AF group (
Indexed as
Identifiers
40635597What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.