Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40635442›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2025

Unsettling the record: modelling the devastating cumulative effects of selected environmental stressors and loss of human life caused by colonization in Burrard Inlet, Canada.

Meaghan Efford, Spencer Taft, Jesse Morin, Micheal George, Michelle George, Camilla Speller, Villy Christensen

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Bones, shells and baselines-how the past can inform modern marine management, protection and restoration.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  3. Shifting seas: understanding deep-time human impacts on marine ecosystems.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Meaghan EffordInstitute for the Oceans and Fisheries, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5251-225X
Spencer TaftTreaty, Lands & Resources, Tsleil-Waututh Nation, Vancouver, British Columbia V7H 2V6, Canada.
Jesse MorinInstitute for the Oceans and Fisheries, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Micheal GeorgeTreaty, Lands & Resources, Tsleil-Waututh Nation, Vancouver, British Columbia V7H 2V6, Canada.
Michelle GeorgeTreaty, Lands & Resources, Tsleil-Waututh Nation, Vancouver, British Columbia V7H 2V6, Canada.
Camilla SpellerDepartment of Anthropology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1X8, Canada.
Villy ChristensenInstitute for the Oceans and Fisheries, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada.

Funding

Mitacs
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper we present a collaborative, transdisciplinary research project that explores the cumulative ecological and human impacts of colonization on the səl̓ilwət (Tsleil-Wat, Burrard Inlet) ecosystem in what is now known as British Columbia, Canada. səl̓ilwət is at the heart of the traditional and unceded territory of səl̓ilwətaɬ (Tsleil-Waututh), a Coast Salish Indigenous Nation. This research is conducted at the request and under the leadership of səl̓ilwətaɬ. Drawing on archaeology, historical ecology, historical/archival records, and səl̓ilwətaɬ science, we use Ecopath with Ecosim to model selected environmental stressors and the devastating loss of səl̓ilwətaɬ life caused by colonization, from 1750-1980 CE. We include European-introduced smallpox epidemics, the rise in the settler population and settler fishing pressure, the loss of shoreline habitat and the closure of bivalve harvesting owing to industrial and urban pollution. Our results show dramatic change in the ecosystem state following these events, with significant losses in biomass and degradation of ecosystem health during the 230 years that we assess. We demonstrate the ecological impact that smallpox had through loss of both human life and Indigenous stewardship. This research sits within the palaeoenvironmental, palaeoecological and environmental archaeological space of reconstructing past environments and human-to-environment relationships over deep time.This article is part of the theme issue 'Shifting seas: understanding deep-time human impacts on marine ecosystems'.

Indexed as

EcosystemAnimalsArchaeologyBritish ColumbiaHistory, 18th CenturyHumansarchaeologycoastal changecolonizationecosystem modellinghistorical ecologyindigenous sovereignty

Identifiers

PMID40635442
PMCPMC12242311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.