ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2025
Unsettling the record: modelling the devastating cumulative effects of selected environmental stressors and loss of human life caused by colonization in Burrard Inlet, Canada.
Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unsettling the record: modelling the devastating cumulative effects of selected environmental stressors and loss of human life caused by colonization in Burrard Inlet, Canada.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Article
- Bones, shells and baselines-how the past can inform modern marine management, protection and restoration.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Review
- Shifting seas: understanding deep-time human impacts on marine ecosystems.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this paper we present a collaborative, transdisciplinary research project that explores the cumulative ecological and human impacts of colonization on the səl̓ilwət (Tsleil-Wat, Burrard Inlet) ecosystem in what is now known as British Columbia, Canada. səl̓ilwət is at the heart of the traditional and unceded territory of səl̓ilwətaɬ (Tsleil-Waututh), a Coast Salish Indigenous Nation. This research is conducted at the request and under the leadership of səl̓ilwətaɬ. Drawing on archaeology, historical ecology, historical/archival records, and səl̓ilwətaɬ science, we use Ecopath with Ecosim to model selected environmental stressors and the devastating loss of səl̓ilwətaɬ life caused by colonization, from 1750-1980 CE. We include European-introduced smallpox epidemics, the rise in the settler population and settler fishing pressure, the loss of shoreline habitat and the closure of bivalve harvesting owing to industrial and urban pollution. Our results show dramatic change in the ecosystem state following these events, with significant losses in biomass and degradation of ecosystem health during the 230 years that we assess. We demonstrate the ecological impact that smallpox had through loss of both human life and Indigenous stewardship. This research sits within the palaeoenvironmental, palaeoecological and environmental archaeological space of reconstructing past environments and human-to-environment relationships over deep time.This article is part of the theme issue 'Shifting seas: understanding deep-time human impacts on marine ecosystems'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.