ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2025
Bones, shells and baselines-how the past can inform modern marine management, protection and restoration.
Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Aligning observation to action: Integrated monitoring for tropical seascape conservation and restoration.iScience · 2026Review
- Shifting seas: understanding deep-time human impacts on marine ecosystems.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this article, we explore how archaeological and historical perspectives can inform current marine management, protection and restoration efforts, and entice us to rethink our present-day relationships with ocean resources to secure sustainable management. Historical records, archaeological findings, palaeoecological data, local and traditional ecological knowledge are coming together in highly interdisciplinary ways, combining cutting-edge analytical and traditional methods. This research is producing more detailed and nuanced descriptions of past ecosystems that reveal the nature, scale and timing of human influences on the sea in unprecedented detail. The findings help us reset 'shifted baselines'-a phenomenon where long-altered ecosystems are perceived as natural. By bringing clarity to historical human impacts, we can challenge current management paradigms, raise ambitions for recovery of biodiversity loss, improve approaches to habitat restoration and identify promising targets for rewilding. A deeper appreciation of what vibrant seas really look like helps us value and better communicate the benefits recovery can bring for society. Understanding ocean responses to past climates helps us predict and respond to emerging climate pressures today, helping managers develop better approaches to enhance resilience in the face of ongoing and future environmental changes.This article is part of the theme issue 'Shifting seas: understanding deep-time human impacts on marine ecosystems'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.