Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40635384›Full record

ArticleWomen's health (London, England)

At the crossroads: Intersectional approaches to women's health equity.

Zohra S Lassi, Jeannette M Wade, Edward Kwabena Ameyaw

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Women's health (London, England). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zohra S LassiRobinson Research Institute, University of Adelaide, SA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5350-6334
Jeannette M WadeHuman Health Sciences, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9126-5554
Edward Kwabena AmeyawInstitute of Policy Studies and School of Graduate Studies, Lingnan University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR.ORCID 0000-0002-6617-237X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global shifts in health policies have significantly affected access to reproductive healthcare services, with impacts varying greatly across different populations. Recent policy changes in various regions have included defunding reproductive health programs, promoting abstinence-only education, and restricting international non-government organizations from providing comprehensive reproductive healthcare services. These policies have led to clinic closures, reduced access to maternal and reproductive healthcare in low- and middle-income countries, and increased health inequities. While all low-income individuals may experience varying impacts, the consequences vary dramatically. In the case of undocumented immigrants, insurance options are already severely limited, while specialized care may be inaccessible for people with disabilities. These intersectional realities demonstrate how seemingly uniform policies produce radically different outcomes based on one's social position. Using the intersectional framework, this article examines how these impacts are magnified for women who experience multiple forms of marginalization and proposes actions for advocates, policymakers, and scholars to safeguard inclusive healthcare access for all women and birthing people.

Indexed as

Health EquityHealth PolicyHealth Services AccessibilityReproductive Health ServicesWomen's HealthFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHumansintersectionalitymarginalizationwomen’s health

Identifiers

PMID40635384
PMCPMC12254633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.