ArticleJournal of primary care & community health
Patient Experiences of Seeking Specialized Mental Health Care in Norway: A Qualitative Study.
Article in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite the increasing prevalence of mental health concerns in Norway, limited knowledge exists regarding how patients experience accessing specialized mental health services through primary care. General Practitioners (GPs) act as crucial gatekeepers, yet their interactions and referral practices significantly influence patients' help-seeking trajectories. This study aims to explore patient perspectives on the role of GPs as gatekeepers to specialized mental health care, with a focus on communication, decision-making, and navigation challenges within the Norwegian healthcare system.
methodsAn exploratory qualitative study was conducted involving semi-structured interviews with 13 adults (9 women and 4 men), aged 20 to 43 years, who had been referred to specialized mental healthcare in the past 2 years. Participants were recruited using a pragmatic, self-recruitment strategy via social media platforms, and community mental health services. Interviews were conducted between September and October 2021, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed thematically using Braun and Clarke's 6-step reflexive thematic analysis.
resultsThree main themes were generated: (1) "The critical role of GP acknowledgment": participants felt deeply affected by whether their GP validated or dismissed their emotional distress; (2) "An arbitrary choice of treatment": patients reported confusion due to insufficient guidance from GPs, inadequate available information, and perceived randomness in referral practices; and (3) "A degrading process": participants described feeling powerless, frustrated, and personally responsible for their difficulties navigating the referral system, often exacerbating their mental health symptoms.
conclusionPatients frequently experienced feeling unsupported and overwhelmed due to poor GP engagement, inadequate information, and complex referral procedures. Enhancing GP mental health literacy, providing decision-making aids, and creating a centralized digital referral platform could significantly improve patient experiences, reduce waiting times, and foster a more effective, equitable, and patient-centered mental health care system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.