ArticleJournal of primary care & community health
Determinants of Foot Care Adherence Among High-Risk Diabetic Populations: Insights From an Ethnic Minority Community Study in Southwest China.
Article in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEffective foot care is crucial for preventing diabetic foot ulcers (DFU). While previous studies have identified general determinants of foot care adherence, the unique challenges faced by ethnic minority communities in rural settings remain underexplored. This qualitative study aimed to explore determinants of foot care among individuals at high risk of DFU in an ethnic minority community in Southwest China.
methodsTwenty participants from 4 local communities were recruited, and data were collected through semi-structured interviews. Data from the interviews were analyzed using a thematic analysis approach.
resultsThematic analysis revealed 3 key themes: prioritization of personal health needs, historical cultural perception, and interaction within working and family contexts. Notably, misconceptions regarding the correlation between blood circulation and foot odor have diminished the perceived importance of foot care, while misunderstandings about food and nutrition indirectly impacted it. Foot hygiene practices are performed less consistently compared to handwashing in daily life.
conclusionsThis study provides novel insights into the specific determinants of foot care adherence among high-risk diabetic populations in a rural, ethnic minority setting. The findings emphasize the need for culturally tailored interventions that address misconceptions, language barriers, and social dynamics to improve foot care practices and reduce the risk of DFU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.