ReviewCurrent molecular medicine2026
A Comparative Review of Methods for Detecting Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations in Cell-free DNA from Lung Cancer Patients.
Review in Current molecular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality. Determining the T790M resistance variants and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations is crucial for personalized treatment, especially when using targeted therapies.
objectiveThis review article aims to comprehensively compare some of the various diagnostic techniques associated with liquid biopsies, such as cell-free DNA (cfDNA) for T790M and EGFR mutant identification. It also aims to evaluate their pertinence in clinical settings, as well as their sensitivity and specificity to determine how effectively they monitor treatment response and resistance.
methodsA literature search was conducted using databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. The keyword list included "EGFR mutations," "T790M resistance," "liquid biopsy," "COLD PCR," "NGS," "ddPCR," "BEAMing," and other methods. The effect of these studies on diagnostic technologies for identifying EGFR mutations was assessed in terms of clinical practice, methodological accuracy, and significance. Sensitivity, specificity, clinical applicability, cost analysis, turnaround times, and ease of integration into clinical workflows were used as parameters for evaluation based on the literature.
resultsThere are advantages and disadvantages to cfDNA monitoring strategies for treatment response and resistance, as well as to the assessment of sensitivity, specificity, and clinical applicability for identifying EGFR mutations.
conclusionAdvanced techniques such as COLD-PCR, LC-MS, qPCR, NGS sequencing, Sanger sequencing, PNA microarrays, the Allele-Specific Competitive Extension (ASCE) real-time PCR assay, and nanopore technology are necessary for personalized lung cancer management. However, depending on the objective of the work, the suitable method should be selected based on its benefits and drawbacks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40635223What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.