Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40635185›Full record

ArticleDementia (London, England)2026

Communication Strategies Used in Primary Progressive Aphasia: A Scoping Review.

Inês Cadório, Daniela Vieira

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Dementia (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Inês CadórioRISE-Health, Escola Superior de Saúde Fernando Pessoa, Fundação Ensino e Cultura Fernando Pessoa, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-6142-2341
Daniela VieiraRISE-Health, Escola Superior de Saúde Fernando Pessoa, Fundação Ensino e Cultura Fernando Pessoa, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-8263-0927

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary progressive aphasia describes a group of language-led dementias that affects an individual's ability to speak, comprehend, read and write. While post-stroke aphasia has been the subject of extensive research, particularly in the domain of communication strategies, the same level of research interest has not been observed in PPA. This is indicative of a significant knowledge gap regarding effective communication strategies in PPA. The present review aims to outline the current research evidence related to the range of communication strategies employed within PPA individuals and their effectiveness. A series of studies were considered, encompassing patients diagnosed with PPA, their spouses and/or other communication partners, provided that data on the utilization and training of communication strategies was addressed. A total of 26 non-experimental and experimental studies met the inclusion criteria. Communication strategies retrieved varied from verbal, to non-verbal, environmental modification strategies and partner adaptation strategies. The findings demonstrate that assistive augmented communication strategies have a positive impact on communication interactions. Furthermore, the multiple use of different modalities ensures the optimal conveyance of messages. Consequently, the degree of independence exhibited by the subjects increases, as does their overall quality of life.

Indexed as

Aphasia, Primary ProgressiveCommunicationHumansQuality of Lifeaugmentative and alternative communicationcommunication partnerscommunication strategiescompensatory strategiesprimary progressive aphasia

Identifiers

PMID40635185
PMCPMC13062470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.