Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40635180›Full record

ArticleJournal of sleep research2026

A Selective Effect of Partial Sleep Deprivation on Metaphor Generation Among Healthy Young Adults.

Adi Lifshitz-Ben-Basat, Leah Fostick, Nira Mashal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of sleep research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Adi Lifshitz-Ben-BasatDepartment of Communication Disorders, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-6532-2367
Leah FostickDepartment of Communication Disorders, Auditory Perception Lab in the Name of Laurent Levi, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel.
Nira MashalFaculty of Education, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Partial sleep deprivation (SD), a common phenomenon in modern life, is known to impair cognitive and linguistic processes. This study investigates its selective effect on metaphor generation, differentiating between conventional and novel metaphors. Twenty-five healthy young adults underwent two sessions involving either regular sleep or partial SD conditions. Participants completed tasks evaluating metaphor generation, cognitive flexibility (Stroop Test), and executive function (Wisconsin Card Sorting Test). Results revealed that partial SD increased the production of conventional metaphors, associated with bottom-up processes and default mode network (DMN) activation. However, it did not significantly affect novel metaphor generation, which relies on top-down cognitive control and frontoparietal network (FPN) activity. Furthermore, Stroop Test findings showed slower reaction times under incongruent conditions after partial SD, indicating reduced cognitive control. These results suggest that partial SD selectively impairs top-down processes while enhancing bottom-up retrieval, leading to a shift in metaphor generation patterns. This research highlights the distinct neural mechanisms underlying different types of metaphor generation and their differential sensitivity to partial SD, providing theoretical and psycholinguistic insights into the cognitive effects of SD.

Indexed as

Executive FunctionMetaphorSleep DeprivationAdultCognitionFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePsycholinguisticsReaction TimeStroop TestYoung Adultcognitive controlcognitive flexibilityexecutive functionsmetaphorssleep deprivation

Identifiers

PMID40635180
PMCPMC13003270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.