Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40635127›Full record

ReviewComprehensive reviews in food science and food safety2025

Scaling Cultured Meat: Challenges and Solutions for Affordable Mass Production.

Huiwen Gu, Yan Kong, Dejian Huang, Youfa Wang, Vijaya Raghavan, Jin Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Bioreactor Design and Engineering for Cultivated Meat Manufacturing.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Huiwen GuKey Laboratory of Environmental Medicine and Engineering, and Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Yan KongKey Laboratory of Environmental Medicine and Engineering, and Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Dejian HuangDepartment of Food Science and Technology, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-2305-3960
Youfa WangKey Laboratory of Environmental Medicine and Engineering, and Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Vijaya RaghavanDepartment of Bioresource Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, McGill University, Quebec, Canada.
Jin WangKey Laboratory of Environmental Medicine and Engineering, and Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3117-9173

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2022YFF1102400
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the global population grows and meat consumption increases, the demand for sustainable and efficient food systems becomes urgent. Cultured meat (CM) has emerged as a promising alternative to conventional meat, offering potential benefits in environmental conservation, resource efficiency, and animal welfare. Although the cost of CM has dropped dramatically-from $2.3 million/kg for the first cultured beef burger to $63/kg-it remains prohibitively expensive and confined to small-scale production. Recent advancements in areas, such as cell density, cell doubling times, and bioreactor efficiency, have shown promise in further reducing costs. Thus, transformative innovations in all aspects of CM production will contribute to achieving price parity with conventional meat. This review explores the four core technologies underpinning CM production: cell line development, serum-free media, scaffold fabrication, and bioreactor design, with a focus on achieving economical, large-scale production through their interdependence and integration. These technologies converge around three key breakthroughs: engineering genetically stable, highly expandable, and functionalized cell lines to minimize reliance on tissue sampling and expensive growth factors; utilizing plant-based substitutes and recombinant protein alternatives to reduce the costs of media and scaffolds while enhancing biocompatibility; and optimizing bioreactors to provide dynamic environmental control, enabling high-density cell cultures at scale. By synthesizing recent advancements and addressing critical challenges, this review outlines a roadmap for cost-effective, industrial-scale CM production. It provides strategies to reduce costs, improve scalability, and contribute to global food security, ultimately establishing CM as a viable and sustainable alternative to conventional meat production.

Indexed as

MeatAnimalsBioreactorsCattleCell Culture TechniquesHumansIn Vitro Meatbioengineeringcell mediumcell sourcingcultured meatfuture foodnew protein sourcescaffold

Identifiers

PMID40635127
PMCPMC12241508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.