Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40635072›Full record

ArticleVirology journal2025

Diagnostic criteria for Epstein-barr virus-associated encephalitis: a comment on Liu et al.

Fereshte Sheybani, Mahboubeh Haddad

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Virology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fereshte SheybaniDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran. fereshtesheybani@gmail.com.
Mahboubeh HaddadDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe read with great interest the article by Liu et al., titled "Clinical features and risk factors for Epstein-Barr virus-associated encephalitis: a retrospective cohort study." The study provides valuable insights into the clinical spectrum and risk factors associated with EBV-related encephalitis. MAIN BODY: While Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is frequently detected in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) during CNS infections, its role as a primary pathogen remains uncertain, especially in immunocompromised patients. We commend the authors for their efforts but seek clarification on the diagnostic criteria used to attribute causality to EBV. Specifically, we question whether the diagnosis relied solely on the detection of EBV DNA in the CSF or whether supporting parameters, such as viral load, CSF/serum ratios, or intrathecal antibody synthesis, were considered. The distinction between causative and incidental EBV detection is clinically significant and remains a challenge in neuroinfectious disease practice.

conclusionFurther elaboration on how EBV-associated encephalitis was defined in the study would enhance its clinical relevance and aid practitioners encountering similar diagnostic complexities.

Indexed as

Encephalitis, ViralEpstein-Barr Virus InfectionsHerpesvirus 4, HumanDNA, ViralHumansRetrospective StudiesViral LoadDNA, ViralCerebrospinal fluidCNS infectionDiagnosisEncephalitisEpstein-Barr virusMetagenomic Next-Generation sequencing

Identifiers

PMID40635072
PMCPMC12243388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.