Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40635028›Full record

ArticleGut pathogens2025

Salmonella prevalence and serovar distribution in reptiles: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Claire Muslin, Paula Salas-Brito, Dayana Coello, Diana Morales-Jadán, Carolina Viteri-Dávila, Marco Coral-Almeida

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gut pathogens, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Persistence of non-typhoidalFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Claire MuslinOne Health Research Group, Universidad de Las Américas, Quito, Ecuador. claire.muslin@gmail.com.
Paula Salas-BritoOne Health Research Group, Universidad de Las Américas, Quito, Ecuador.
Dayana CoelloOne Health Research Group, Universidad de Las Américas, Quito, Ecuador.
Diana Morales-JadánOne Health Research Group, Universidad de Las Américas, Quito, Ecuador.
Carolina Viteri-DávilaOne Health Research Group, Universidad de Las Américas, Quito, Ecuador.
Marco Coral-AlmeidaFacultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Carrera de Medicina Veterinaria, Universidad de Las Américas, Quito, Ecuador.

Funding

Universidad de Las Américas Ecuador VET.CM.19.05
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReptiles are recognized as reservoirs of Salmonella bacteria, and the expansion of the global pet reptile trade has led to reptile-associated salmonellosis emerging as a significant public health concern. To characterize the risk posed by reptiles as a source of Salmonella transmission to humans, we conducted the first comprehensive meta-analysis to estimate the worldwide prevalence of Salmonella in both wild and captive reptiles and identify the primary factors influencing this prevalence.

resultsWe systematically reviewed publications reporting the prevalence of Salmonella spp. intestinal isolation in reptiles, published between 1986 and 2023, across the PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases. The 179 studies included examined a total of 23,411 reptiles from 56 countries across all continents, with 49.9% being free-ranging animals and 48.4% living in captivity, mainly from zoos, pet shops, or households. The overall pooled prevalence of Salmonella spp. in reptiles was estimated at 30.4% (95% confidence interval, CI: 27.4-33.6%). Notably, significant variations in Salmonella spp. colonization rates were observed across different reptile taxa, with snakes exhibiting the highest prevalence at 63.1% (95%CI: 57.4-68.4%), followed by lizards at 33.6% (95%CI: 28.6-39.0%), and turtles and crocodiles with similar rates of 11.2% (95%CI: 8.8-14.2%) and 10.5% (95%CI: 5.7-18.6%), respectively. Furthermore, significant differences in Salmonella spp. prevalence were observed across different reptile families within each taxon. The data suggest that captivity is a contributing factor to Salmonella spp. colonization, as captive reptiles showed significantly higher prevalence rates (37.8%, 95%CI: 34.3-41.4%) compared to their wild counterparts (14.8%, 95%CI: 11.0-19.6%). Additionally, we found that the inclusion of pre-enrichment and selective enrichment steps in culture broths significantly improved the sensitivity of both culture-based and PCR-based Salmonella detection methods. Importantly, the study revealed that reptiles primarily carried Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica, responsible for most human salmonellosis cases. Of particular concern, several human-pathogenic Salmonella serovars of public health relevance, such as Enteritidis, Typhimurium and Newport, were identified among the 10 most common serovars colonizing reptiles.

conclusionsCollectively, these findings highlight the substantial health threat posed by reptiles as a source of human Salmonella infection and may inform the development of policies and strategies for prevention and public education to mitigate the risk of reptile-associated salmonellosis.

Indexed as

PetPrevalenceReptileSalmonellaSerovarZoonosis

Identifiers

PMID40635028
PMCPMC12243343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.