Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40635025›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2025

High exposure to malaria vector bites despite high use of bednets in a setting of seasonal malaria in southwestern Mali: the urgent need for outdoor vector control strategies.

Sophie Sarrassat, Mahamoudou Toure, Mohamed Traore, Ayouba Diarra, Hamady Coulibaly, Abdoul Zamilou Arou, Cheick Oumar Tangara, Gunter Muller, John Carlton Beier, John Vontas and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Serological evidence of continued exposure toFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Sophie SarrassatDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK. sophie.sarrassat@lshtm.ac.uk.
Mahamoudou ToureUniversity Clinical Research Centre/University of Sciences, Techniques and Technologies of Bamako (UCRC/USTTB), Bamako, Mali.
Mohamed TraoreUniversity Clinical Research Centre/University of Sciences, Techniques and Technologies of Bamako (UCRC/USTTB), Bamako, Mali.
Ayouba DiarraUniversity Clinical Research Centre/University of Sciences, Techniques and Technologies of Bamako (UCRC/USTTB), Bamako, Mali.
Hamady CoulibalyUniversity Clinical Research Centre/University of Sciences, Techniques and Technologies of Bamako (UCRC/USTTB), Bamako, Mali.
Abdoul Zamilou ArouUniversity Clinical Research Centre/University of Sciences, Techniques and Technologies of Bamako (UCRC/USTTB), Bamako, Mali.
Cheick Oumar TangaraUniversity Clinical Research Centre/University of Sciences, Techniques and Technologies of Bamako (UCRC/USTTB), Bamako, Mali.
Gunter MullerUniversity Clinical Research Centre/University of Sciences, Techniques and Technologies of Bamako (UCRC/USTTB), Bamako, Mali.
John Carlton BeierUniversity of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
John VontasInstitute of Molecular Biology & Biotechnology/Foundation for Research and Technology, Athens, Greece.
John BradleyDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Sekou F TraoreUniversity Clinical Research Centre/University of Sciences, Techniques and Technologies of Bamako (UCRC/USTTB), Bamako, Mali.
Seydou DoumbiaUniversity Clinical Research Centre/University of Sciences, Techniques and Technologies of Bamako (UCRC/USTTB), Bamako, Mali.
Immo KleinschmidtDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.

Funding

Multidisciplinary Implementation Research for malaria control and elimination in West AfricaU19AI129387 · NIAID · UNIV OF SCIENCES, TECH & TECH OF BAMAKO · PI SEYDOU DOUMBIA · 2017 to 2026
$8.2M
Training Program on Operational and Health Services Research for Malaria in MaliD43TW008652 · FIC · UNIV OF SCIENCES, TECH & TECH OF BAMAKO · PI SEYDOU DOUMBIA, Alexandre Delamou · 2010 to 2026
$3.1M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW008652Gates Foundation INV-007509NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI129387Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation 81067480UK Aid 30041-105
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly evening and outdoor biting by vector mosquitoes undermines the effectiveness of insecticide-treated nets (ITNs), as users of nets are exposed to vector biting whilst not under a net, both outdoors and indoors. This study assessed exposure to malaria vector bites amongst users and non-users of ITNs in southwestern Mali.

methodsUsing cross-sectional household survey data of human behaviour and malaria infection prevalence, along with mosquito human landing catch (HLC) data collected in 30 separate communities, the average number of Anopheles gambiae sensu lato (s.l.) mosquito bites per person per night (bppn) received outdoors and indoors were estimated for each survey respondent. The proportion of bites that were not preventable by using a net, the relative contributions of outdoor and indoor residual biting, and the risk factors for exposure to vector bites were estimated.

resultsDespite very high use of nets (93.2%), malaria infection prevalence was 34% overall. A large proportion of respondents (78%) reported being outdoors at 8 pm, but by midnight, 98% were indoors. Net users were exposed to indoor biting for 1 h, on average, between going indoors and going to bed. For 91%, the net used was an ITN. Human biting rates peaked between 2 and 4 am, when most people (90%) were in bed. Individuals using a net received 11.2 bppn in total, of which 7.1 bppn (63%) occurred outdoors. Those not using a net received almost 10 times the number of bites indoors as net users (38.4 bppn versus 4.0 bppn). The total number of bites received by net users was about one third the total number of bites received by non-net users, indicating the proportion of bites not preventable by use of a net alone. Risk factors for biting exposure included not using a net, going indoors late, location near the river and age over 15 years.

conclusionsITNs substantially reduce exposure to indoor biting, but in this setting, net users still received a large number of Anopheles mosquito bites, giving rise to high malaria infection prevalence despite near-universal net use. Most residual biting occurred outdoors, but about a third still occurred with individuals indoors before going under a net. Effective interventions that reduce residual outdoor and indoor biting are necessary to reduce the high malaria burden in settings like southwestern Mali.

Indexed as

AnophelesInsect Bites and StingsInsecticide-Treated BednetsMalariaMosquito ControlMosquito VectorsAdolescentAdultAnimalsChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMaliMalaria vector controlMaliOutdoor and indoor malaria vector bitesResidual malaria transmission

Identifiers

PMID40635025
PMCPMC12243244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.