ArticleHead & face medicine2025
New measurement method for long-term oral complications after harvesting buccal mucosa grafts for urethroplasty.
Article in Head & face medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A reproducible single-surgeon technique for buccal mucosa graft harvest in urethroplasty using circumferential oral retraction: technique description and case series.International urology and nephrology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients undergoing oral mucosa harvesting for urethroplasty may experience several challenges during recovery like scarring or changes in oral sensitivity, which can lead to long-term discomfort. In this retrospective study long-term donor site complications after harvesting of oral mucosa for urethroplasty were evaluated and a new measurement method for oral volume differences between the non-operated and operated sides was applied.
methodsThirty adult male patients who underwent urethroplasty with buccal mucosa grafting were included. At a median of 43 months after surgery, a standardized questionnaire was used, and clinical examinations were conducted to measure the postoperative elasticity of the buccal mucosa. This measurement compared the non-operated side with the operated side. Additionally, we examined descriptive statistics and the influence of smoking status, diabetes mellitus, immunosuppression, alcohol consumption, and graft size.
resultsIn total, 36% of the patients reported persistent subjective postoperative impairments, such as tightness in the oral cavity or numbness. In all patients, a difference in buccal volume was observed between the operated side and the non-operated side. This volume difference ranged from 3 to 15 ml (mean 8.10 ml, SD ± 3.4; p < 0.001). As the size of the harvested transplant increased, the postoperative buccal volume difference also increased significantly (p < 0.001). In one patient, follow-up surgery was required due to the severity of scarring. The presence of diabetes mellitus, immunosuppressive medication, smoking status, and alcohol consumption had no statistically significant effect on postoperative buccal elasticity or mouth opening.
conclusionsThe use of buccal mucosa grafts for urethroplasty is an established procedure in urology, but the oral harvesting procedure can lead to scarring within the buccal area, which is associated with a statistically significant decrease in buccal volume compared with the non-operated site. The volume analysis was performed by applying a new measurement method, which enables, for the first time, the quantification of oral donor site morbidity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.