ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2025
Immediate effect of ankle joint and rectus abdominis kinesiology taping on static and dynamic balance in rhythmic gymnasts aged 10-12 years.
Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBalance is a critical component of athletic performance, particularly in disciplines such as rhythmic gymnastics. This study aimed to examine the immediate effects of kinesiology taping on static and dynamic balance in rhythmic gymnasts aged 10–12 years.
methodsThirty gymnasts were evaluated under three taping conditions: (1) no kinesiology tape (No KinT), (2) kinesiology tape applied to the ankle joints (KinT A), and (3) kinesiology tape applied to both the ankle joints and the rectus abdominis muscle (KinT AA). Balance assessments included the Static Stork Balance Test, the Dynamic Y Balance Test, and the Static and Dynamic “Bobo” Balance Board test.
resultsNo significant differences were observed across conditions in the Stork Balance Test for both legs and static balance board measurements (p > 0.05). The Y Balance Test results improved when kinesiology tape was applied to both the ankle joints and the rectus abdominis muscle compared to the condition without taping for both legs (p < 0.05). In contrast, the dynamic balance board test demonstrated significantly better performance in the KinT A condition compared to both the No KinT and KinT AA conditions on the right leg (p < 0.05) and compared to the KinT AA condition on the left leg (p < 0.05). Additionally, for both legs, the No KinT condition showed superior performance relative to the KinT AA condition (p < 0.05).
conclusionsKinesiology taping had no immediate effect on static balance. However, dynamic balance, as assessed by the Y Balance Test, improved with tape applied to both the ankle joints and the rectus abdominis muscle. The balance board tests indicated inconsistent results, suggesting variability in their sensitivity to taping interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.