ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025
Comparative analysis of 3D CT values for different lumbar pedicle screw trajectories.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
STUDY
objectivesThe average CT values of the three-dimensional (3D) trajectories of transarticular surface (TAS) screws, traditional trajectory (TT) pedicle screws, and cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screws in the L4 and L5 vertebral bodies were evaluated, providing a radiological theoretical basis for the utilization of the transarticular surface screw trajectory (TAST) at these vertebral levels.
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 3D CT images of the lumbar spine from 300 patients aged 21–70 years obtained from January to August 2024. Using Mimics 21.0 software, cylindrical models were constructed to simulate three types of pedicle screws, and the average CT values of the target cylindrical area (TCA) were measured. Further exploration of the relationships between factors such as age, sex, lumbar segment, and average CT values for the TCA was conducted.
resultsAmong the different age groups, the average CT value of the CBT group was the highest, followed by those of the TAS and TT screw groups (P < 0.05). Among patients of the same gender and age group, no significant difference was found in the average CT values of the same trajectory between the L4 and L5 vertebrae. Furthermore, in the 31–40 and 41–50 age groups, no significant difference was noted in the average CT values for the CBT between males and females. However, in the 21–30, 51–60, and 61–70 age groups, the average CT values of TT, CBT, and TAST were greater in males than in females (p < 0.05).
conclusionsThe average CT values of the L4 and L5 vertebral bodies for the TAST exceed those for the TT but are lower than those for the CBT. This radiological study offers a theoretical basis for using TAS screws in the L4 and L5 vertebral bodies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.