Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40634919›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2025

The potential benefit of an educational intervention on needle stick injury prevention among dental students at the university of Ha'il, Saudi Arabia: a prospective study.

Abdullah F Alshammari, Ahmed A Madfa, Yousef E Alenezi, Hala M Alshammari, Dhay M Alazaima, Abeer S Alotaibi, Hamdan A Alshammari, Freah L Alshammary, Sameer Shaikh, Khlood A Alkurdi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Abdullah F AlshammariDepartment of Basic Dental and Medical Science, College of Dentistry, University of Ha'il, Ha'il, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Abd.alshamari@uoh.edu.sa.
Ahmed A MadfaDepartment of Restorative Dental Science, College of Dentistry, University of Ha'il, Ha'il, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. ahmed_um_2011@yahoo.com.
Yousef E AleneziDental Intern, College of Dentistry, University of Ha'il, Ha'il, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Hala M AlshammariDental Student, College of Dentistry, University of Ha'il, Ha'il, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Dhay M AlazaimaDental Student, College of Dentistry, University of Ha'il, Ha'il, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Abeer S AlotaibiDental Student, College of Dentistry, University of Ha'il, Ha'il, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Hamdan A AlshammariDental Student, College of Dentistry, University of Ha'il, Ha'il, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Freah L AlshammaryDepartment of Preventive Dental Science, College of Dentistry, University of Ha'il, Ha'il, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Sameer ShaikhDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery and Diagnostic Science, College of Dentistry, University of Ha'il, Ha'il, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Khlood A AlkurdiMinistry of Health, Qassim Health Cluster, King Saud Hospital, Unayzah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeedle stick injuries (NSIs) pose a significant occupational hazard to healthcare professionals, including dental students. Despite the availability of guidelines and preventive strategies, knowledge, training, and compliance remain inadequate among dental students. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the Prospective gain of an educational pack in reducing NSIs and improving knowledge of attitudes towards, and compliance with NSI prevention and management guidelines among dental students.

methodsA prospective audit design was employed over four weeks, involving fourth-, fifth-, and sixth-year dental students. The study consisted of three phases: pre-assessment, educational intervention, and post-assessment. Baseline knowledge, attitudes, and practices were evaluated using a structured questionnaire. Self-reported compliance with safe sharps handling practices has been designated as the primary outcome. The educational pack, comprising presentations, comparative data, interactive scenarios, and guidelines, was delivered during the intervention phase. Post-intervention assessments used the same questionnaire to measure changes in outcomes. Data were analysed using SPSS, and statistical significance was set at p ≤ 0.05.

resultsPost-intervention, the incidence of NSIs significantly decreased, with self-reported cases reducing from 17.2% to 4.3%. Knowledge scores improved markedly, with the percentage of correct answers to key questions rising from 34.5% to 93.1% among sixth-year students (p = 0.032). Gender-based analysis revealed statistically significant improvements in scores for both male and female students, with female students achieving higher post-assessment scores for key questions (e.g. 93.8% vs 75.6%, p = 0.014). Students with lower GPAs demonstrated the greatest improvement, with scores increasing from 14.3% to 100% in some areas (p = 0.022).

conclusionThe findings underscore the change following the intervention of structured infection control training in reducing NSIs and improving adherence to guidelines. Integrating such programs into dental curricula is vital for fostering a culture of safety and compliance in clinical practice. This study aligns with Saudi Vision 2030, emphasising the importance of enhancing healthcare quality and occupational safety through targeted educational interventions.

Indexed as

Education, DentalHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeNeedlestick InjuriesStudents, DentalAdultFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesSaudi ArabiaSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultDental educationDental studentsInfection controlNeedle stick injuriesOccupational exposureSaudi ArabiaSharp injury

Identifiers

PMID40634919
PMCPMC12243357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.