ArticleInternational orthopaedics2025
Influence of supraspinatus retraction size on functional outcome after arthroscopic direct repair.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe objective was to assess whether the size of the supraspinatus tendon retraction following a degenerative full-thickness rotator cuff tear influenced the functional outcome after arthroscopic direct repair.
methodsA prospective comparative cohort study of 65 patients underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with a follow-up of 24 months. The mean age was 60.0 years (SD, 9.2). According to the supraspinatus tendon retraction, patients were included into the shorter retraction group (≤ 20 mm; n = 32) and longer retraction group (> 20 mm; n = 33). Clinical outcomes were assessed with the Constant-Murley score and visual analogue scale for pain. Radiological evaluation included magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
resultsPostoperatively, both groups significantly improved functional and pain outcomes, with no significant differences at the final follow-up (p = 0.671). The mean time interval between the onset of patient-reported symptoms and surgery was not significantly correlated with the retraction size (r = 0.12, p = 0.066). The multivariate analysis did not show significant predictors of satisfactory functional outcome, especially the tendon retraction size (OR 1.0; 95% CI 0.9-1.1; p = 0.728).
conclusionIn degenerative tears, the size of the supraspinatus tendon retraction was not correlated with the duration of the symptoms. The tendon retraction of up to 4 cm did not influence the functional outcome at 24 postoperative months, regardless of the arthroscopic repair technique of one or two rows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40634772What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.