ReviewClinical and experimental medicine2025
The AML immune paradox: decoding escape pathways and pioneering checkpoint, vaccine, and combination strategies.
Review in Clinical and experimental medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immunotherapy in acute myeloid leukemia: The antibodies, TriKEs, and CARs on the arduous road to cure.Blood reviews · 2026Review
- TIM-3 in AML: a janus-faced orchestrator of immune exhaustion and leukemic self-renewal.Cancer cell international · 2026Review
- Leveraging Deep Learning to Construct a Programmed Cell Death-Driven Prognostic Signature in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Article
- Immunophenotypic Heterogeneity and Clonal Sweep in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Revealed by Flow Cytometry: A Case Series Study.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- Biomarkers and advances in AML-MRC: from bench to bedside.Annals of hematology · 2026Review
- Decoding the archipelago: single-cell biomarkers rechart the molecular geography of acute myeloid leukemia.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026Review
- Increased IL4I1 expression predicts poor survival and modulates the immune microenvironment in acute myeloid leukemia.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Beyond CRISPR: next-gen precision engineering of CAR-NK cells for enhanced persistence, trafficking, and tumor eradication.Cancer cell international · 2026Review
- Hijacking the helpers: platelet and neutrophil trafficking in AML and therapeutic exploitation.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2026Review
- The tumor microenvironment in leukemia: molecular pathways of immune evasion.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Concurrent therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia and lymph node tuberculosis following treatment for lung squamous cell carcinoma: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Beyond the DNA sequence: mapping the dynamic epigenetic landscape for risk stratification and therapeutic intervention in acute myeloid leukemia.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025Review
- Beyond single biomarkers: multi-omics strategies to predict immunotherapy outcomes in blood cancers.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025Review
- CAR-T and CAR-NK cell therapies in AML: breaking barriers and charting the future.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Review
- Ferroptosis in AML: nanoparticles, biomarkers, and immune rewiring for therapeutic breakthroughs.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- MMP11 predicts colorectal cancer outcomes and its inhibitor RXP03 exerts anti-tumor effects via apoptosis activation.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains a high-mortality cancer due to its aggressive nature and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME), which enables evasion of immune surveillance. Despite chemotherapy and targeted therapies, 5-year survival is ~ 30%, necessitating novel immunotherapies. AML suppresses cytotoxic T/NK cells by co-opting regulatory pathways, creating an "immune paradox." Emerging strategies aim to disrupt this evasion. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), such as anti-PD-1 nivolumab and anti-CD47 magrolimab, combined with hypomethylating agents (HMAs), enhance T-cell activity and phagocytosis, especially in TP53-mutated AML. Therapeutic vaccines targeting leukemia-associated antigens (e.g., WT1, PRAME) via dendritic cell fusion show early success in prolonging remission. Combinatorial approaches, like HMAs with STING agonists or dual checkpoint blockade, target multiple immunosuppressive pathways to overcome resistance. Challenges include TME heterogeneity, therapy-resistant leukemia stem cells, toxicities (e.g., anemia, cytokine release syndrome), relapse from clonal evolution, and a lack of predictive biomarkers. Autologous therapies face economic and logistical hurdles, driving demand for scalable solutions. Advances in single-cell genomics, AI, and synthetic biology are identifying novel targets (TIM-3, TIGIT, VISTA) and improving patient stratification. Integrating these innovations may transform AML into a chronic condition, bridging preclinical potential to clinical impact. In this review, we aim to evaluate mechanisms, challenges, and future directions of immunotherapies in AML with highlighting ICIs and vaccination to improve therapeutic outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.