Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40634726›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2025

Comparative analysis of postoperative inflammation and pain: robot-assisted versus single-incision laparoscopic surgery for right-sided colon cancer.

Yasuhiro Ishiyama, Yasumitsu Hirano, Sohei Akuta, Yume Minagawa, Akihito Nakanishi, Yusuke Nishi, Hisashi Hayashi, Takatsugu Fujii, Hirofumi Sugita, Chikashi Hiranuma

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yasuhiro IshiyamaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, 1397-1 Yamane, Hidaka, Saitama, Japan. yishiyama1215@saitama-med.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7754-7926
Yasumitsu HiranoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, 1397-1 Yamane, Hidaka, Saitama, Japan.
Sohei AkutaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, 1397-1 Yamane, Hidaka, Saitama, Japan.
Yume MinagawaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, 1397-1 Yamane, Hidaka, Saitama, Japan.
Akihito NakanishiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, 1397-1 Yamane, Hidaka, Saitama, Japan.
Yusuke NishiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, 1397-1 Yamane, Hidaka, Saitama, Japan.
Hisashi HayashiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, 1397-1 Yamane, Hidaka, Saitama, Japan.
Takatsugu FujiiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, 1397-1 Yamane, Hidaka, Saitama, Japan.
Hirofumi SugitaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, 1397-1 Yamane, Hidaka, Saitama, Japan.
Chikashi HiranumaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, 1397-1 Yamane, Hidaka, Saitama, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn recent years, surgical approaches for treating colorectal cancer have shifted from open surgery to laparoscopic surgery and, more recently, to robot-assisted surgery (RAS), yet their relative impact on postoperative inflammation and pain remains unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the postoperative C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (CRA) and Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores between RAS and single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for right-sided colon cancer to assess which surgical modality might be more minimally invasive.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 180 patients who underwent surgical resection for right-sided colon cancer at Saitama Medical University International Medical Center (Hidaka, Saitama, Japan) between March 2021 and October 2024. Among these patients, 80 underwent RAS (RAS group) and 100 underwent SILS (SILS group). Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied, and 67 patients from each group were selected for comparison. Primary outcomes were the CRA and pain intensity on the NRS on postoperative days (POD) 1 and 3. Secondary outcomes included operative time, blood loss, and major complications (Clavien-Dindo > II).

resultsAfter PSM, there were no significant differences in the patient background variables, including the preoperative CRA, between the groups. The operative time was significantly shorter in the SILS group than in the RAS group (SILS vs. RAS: 157 vs. 193 min, p < 0.001). Although the CRA did not differ on POD 1 and 3, the SILS group had a significantly higher CRA than the RAS group. The RAS group had a significantly lower NRS score on POD 1.

conclusionFor right-sided colon cancer surgery, SILS involves fewer and smaller incisions and a shorter operative time. However, RAS was associated with a lower early postoperative inflammatory response and pain in this PSM comparison. The refined precision and reduced tissue manipulation offered by robotic systems may explain these differences.

Indexed as

ColectomyColonic NeoplasmsInflammationLaparoscopyPostoperative PainRobotic Surgical ProceduresAgedC-Reactive ProteinFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimePain MeasurementPropensity ScoreRetrospective StudiesC-Reactive ProteinColorectal cancerPropensity score matching (PSM)Robot-assisted surgery (RAS)Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS)

Identifiers

PMID40634726
PMCPMC12287206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.