Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40634644›Full record

Observational studyScientific reports2025

The usefulness of transvaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of pelvic venous disorders.

Filip Szkodziak, Sławomir Woźniak, Marek Kudła, Patrycja Rogowska-Malicka, Piotr Szkodziak, Maciej Paszkowski, Krzysztof Pyra, Tomasz Paszkowski

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Optimizing Venographic Referrals in Pelvic Congestion Syndrome: A Prospective Diagnostic Accuracy Study of Ultrasound-Based Scoring to Guide Selective Venography.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Filip Szkodziak3rd Chair and Department of Gynaecology, Medical University of Lublin, ul. Jaczewskiego 8, Lublin, 20-954, Poland. filip.szkodziak@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2138-4694
Sławomir Woźniak3rd Chair and Department of Gynaecology, Medical University of Lublin, ul. Jaczewskiego 8, Lublin, 20-954, Poland.
Marek KudłaDepartment of Perinatology and Oncological Gynecology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Sosnowiec, Poland.
Patrycja Rogowska-Malicka3rd Chair and Department of Gynaecology, Medical University of Lublin, ul. Jaczewskiego 8, Lublin, 20-954, Poland.
Piotr Szkodziak3rd Chair and Department of Gynaecology, Medical University of Lublin, ul. Jaczewskiego 8, Lublin, 20-954, Poland.
Maciej Paszkowski3rd Chair and Department of Gynaecology, Medical University of Lublin, ul. Jaczewskiego 8, Lublin, 20-954, Poland.
Krzysztof PyraDepartment of Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Tomasz Paszkowski3rd Chair and Department of Gynaecology, Medical University of Lublin, ul. Jaczewskiego 8, Lublin, 20-954, Poland.

Funding

Uniwersytet Medyczny w Lublinie (Medical University of Lublin) DS329
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic Pelvic Pain (CPP) is one of the most common condition encountered in the daily practice of gynaecologists. Prevalence estimates for CPP vary from 6.4 to 25.4% depending on population and established criteria, resulting in a heavy social and economic burden. Among the possible reasons of CPP one of the most challenging are Pelvic Venous Disorders (PeVD). PeVD are a group of diseases characterized by the coexistence of CPP and varicose veins localized in the pelvis and lower abdomen. Although pelvic venography is considered the gold standard for diagnosing PeVD, in the clinical practice of a gynaecologist Transvaginal Ultrasonography (TVUS) is the predominant diagnostic method modality in patients with symptoms of PeVD. Our study aimed to assess the usefulness of TVUS in diagnosing PeVD and to determine ultrasound parameters that are useful in identifying such patients. This observational cross-sectional study included 197 patients hospitalized between September 2022 and April 2024. Pelvic venography was performed in 195 patients who met the ultrasonographic criteria for PeVD. Of the 195 patients in whom the TVUS revealed the presence of at least one parameter characteristic for PeVD, pelvic venography confirmed the TVUS findings in 187 (95.9%). PeVD was confirmed in 94.5% of patients with one positive ultrasound parameter, 95.1% with two positive ultrasound parameters, 96.4% with three positive ultrasound parameters, and 100% with four positive ultrasound parameters. Primary gynaecological diagnostics based predominantly on TVUS appears to be crucial in identifying patients with PeVD. Using appropriate criteria, high efficiency in the first-line diagnostics of such patients could be obtained.

Indexed as

Pelvic PainPelvisVaricose VeinsVascular DiseasesAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPhlebographyUltrasonographyVaginaChronic pelvic painPelvic venographyPelvic venous disordersTransvaginal ultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID40634644
PMCPMC12241503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.