ArticleScientific reports2025
Exploring single-head and multi-head CNN and LSTM-based models for road surface classification using on-board vehicle multi-IMU data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Real-Time Edge Computing for Road Surface Classification Using Multi-IMU Data and a Hybrid CNN-LSTM Classification Model.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate road surface monitoring is essential for ensuring vehicle and pedestrian safety, and it relies on robust data acquisition and analysis methods. This study examines the classification of road surface conditions using single- and multi-head deep learning architectures, specifically Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and CNNs combined with Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) layers, applied to data from Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) mounted on vehicle's sprung and unsprung masses. Various model architectures were tested, incorporating IMU data from different positions and utilizing both acceleration and angular velocity features. A grid search was conducted to fine-tune the architectures' hyperparameters, including the number of filters, kernel sizes, and LSTM units. Results show that CNN+LSTM models generally outperformed CNN-only models. The highest-performing model, which used data from three IMUs in a single-head architecture, achieved a macro F1-score of 0.9338. The study highlights the effectiveness of combining IMU data in a single-head architecture and suggests that further improvements in classification accuracy can be achieved by refining the architectures and enhancing the dataset, particularly for more challenging road surface classes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.