ReviewNature protocols2025
Performing life cycle impact assessment with the midpoint and endpoint method ReCiPe.
Review in Nature protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Life cycle environmental impact of novel radiative thermal management textiles in China.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2026Article
- Biochar Enhances Fischer-Tropsch Electrofuels from COACS sustainable chemistry & engineering · 2025Article
- Ecosystem quality in LCIA: status quo, harmonization, and suggestions for the way forward.The international journal of life cycle assessment · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a method to understand and reduce the environmental impact of products over their life cycle. Although general guidelines to perform LCAs are available, specific recommendations on performing and reporting the life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) step in a standardized way are lacking. This lack can lead to incomplete results, followed by misinterpretation. In the LCIA step, the magnitude and significance of the potential environmental impacts are quantified and evaluated. Here, we describe how to systematically perform and report the LCIA step, identify the most meaningful LCA results and check their robustness. To develop the procedure, we used the widely applied LCIA methodology ReCiPe, which includes so-called characterization factors that express the environmental impact per unit of emission or extraction for 18 midpoint categories, such as global warming and acidification, and three endpoint categories (human health damage, ecosystem damage and resource scarcity). The characterization factors are developed for three perspectives, addressing inherent value choices in the calculation models. To demonstrate its use, our method was applied to a passenger car tire case study. We argue for the inclusion of all three endpoint categories and all three perspectives in the initial assessment. Furthermore, we recommend including a midpoint-to-endpoint contribution analysis on the impact results to identify the most important midpoint categories. Being comprehensive on the LCIA results will lead to a clear, distilled message to stakeholders to decrease environmental impacts, without unintended burden shifting across the supply chain or between different environmental impacts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40634596What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.