ArticleJournal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology2025
Designing a set of reference standards for non-targeted analysis of polymer additives extracted from medical devices.
Article in Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Polymeric Smart Materials with Incorporated Small Molecules for Tissue Engineering: A Comprehensive Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Challenging the Database: Day-of-Analysis Calibration and UF Modeling for Reliable RRF Use in Medical Device Chemical Characterization.Analytical chemistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe accurate analysis of extractables and leachables (E&L) from medical devices is crucial for the reliable safety risk assessment of substances to which patients and users may be exposed. The extractable profile of medical devices is often complex and unpredictable, thus improper selection of reference standards can lead to irreproducible chemical analyses between laboratories. ISO 10993-18, the international consensus standard for chemical characterization of medical devices, does not specify a process for selection of appropriate chemical reference standards for non-targeted analysis of E&L, leading to a variety of approaches being used.
objectiveThis study seeks to set out requirements for building a comprehensive list of chemical reference standards for non-targeted analysis of E&L and propose suggestions for selecting appropriate standards to enhance the consistency of chemical analysis.
methodsCriteria for selecting reference standards for non-targeted analysis of E&L in medical devices were developed using relevant polymer additives as a model system. The Relative Response Factor (RRF) values of the selected reference standards were determined using GC-MS and LC-MS analysis across three different concentrations. A system was developed to rank the toxicological hazards of the selected reference standards.
resultsA list of 106 reference standards of polymer additives was compiled, encompassing a wide range of physicochemical properties and broad toxicological coverage. Statistical analyses of these chemicals revealed there was no significant correlation between their six physicochemical properties and the corresponding relative response factors measured by GC-MS and LC-MS techniques. IMPACT: Accurate chemical identification and quantification of extractable substances from medical devices is important for chemical characterization of medical devices. The accurate quantitation of extractable chemicals in medical devices through non-targeted analysis is dependent on the proper selection of reference standards. We have proposed a set of reference standards intended to enhance the confidence in quantitation of device extractables, covering a broad range of structural and physicochemical diversity. This set of reference standards may assist chemistry laboratories in developing robust screening methods for extractables in medical devices, supporting the accurate characterization of medical devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.