ArticleScientific reports2025
Prognostic impacts of left ventricular strain in hemodialytic patients with preserved left ventricular systolic function.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multiple machine learning models for predicting major adverse cardiovascular events in dialysis with clinical and echocardiographic parameters: a retrospective cohort study.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Patterns of Hemodialysis-Induced Acute Global Longitudinal Strain Deterioration and Their Predictors.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- The Effect of Hemodialysis-related Volume Changes on Left and Right Ventricle and Left Atrial Function in Dialysis Patients: A Speckle Tracking Echocardiography Study.Journal of cardiovascular echographyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Left ventricular dysfunction is a known risk factor for morbidity and mortality in hemodialysis patients. The prognostic value of left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV GLS) among those with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) remains uncertain. Subjects with end-stage renal disease initiated hemodialysis at Taipei Veteran General Hospital between 2015 and 2018 were registered. All participants received annually echocardiographic studies thereafter. Left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV), end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) and internal diameter in systole (LVIDs), LVEF, and LV GLS were measured. A LV GLS of > - 15.9% was defined as reduced LV GLS. Clinical outcomes of mortality and hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) were followed. A total of 319 patients with preserved LVEF (66.3 ± 15.1 years, 48.6% men) were recruited in the study. Subjects with reduced LV GLS had more coronary artery disease (CAD), higher LVESV and LVIDs, but were similar in age, gender, co-morbidities, biochemistries and other echocardiographic parameters as the counterpart. Both CAD [(odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs): 1.669, 1.023-2.724], and LVESV (OR per-1 mL and 95% CIs: 1.073, 1.004-1.146) were independent determinants of reduced LV GLS. Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that patients with reduced LV GLS had a significantly lower event-free survival rate compared to those with preserved GLS. The multivariate Cox regression analysis further demonstrated LV GLS as a significant predictor of adverse clinical events (hazard ratio per-1% and 95% CIs: 1.055, 1.002-1.110) after accounting for age, gender, and diabetes. Among the hemodialysis patients with preserved LVEF, LV GLS but not the conventional left ventricular functional indices were associated with long-term mortality and HHF. CAD could be a modifiable risk factor among the subjects with reduced LV GLS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.