ArticleScientific reports2025
A predictive model for sepsis risk in patients with non-traumatic cerebral hemorrhage based on the MIMIC-IV database.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- LDAR is superior to other albumin-derived indices in predicting 28-day ICU mortality in critically ill patients with intracerebral hemorrhage: a two-cohort study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Interpretable machine learning for postoperative sepsis prediction in ICU patients following intracranial hematoma evacuation.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Patients with non-traumatic cerebral hemorrhage admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) are known to be at high risk for developing sepsis. However, limited research exists to quantify this risk. Therefore, this study aimed to develop a reliable predictive model to assess the risk of sepsis in ICU patients with non-traumatic cerebral hemorrhage. We extracted data on patients admitted to the ICU with non-traumatic cerebral hemorrhage from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC IV) database. Afterward, the patients were then randomized in a 7:3 ratio into a training set (N = 1,365) and a validation set (N = 585). Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression and stepwise logistic regression were employed to screen variables within the training set. The final logistic regression model was constructed using the identified key predictors. Finally, the model’s performance was evaluated using decision curves, calibration curves, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. A total of 1,950 patients were included in the study. The training and validation sets comprised 1,365 and 585 patients, respectively. The training set analysis revealed nine crucial predictors for secondary sepsis in ICU patients with non-traumatic cerebral hemorrhage. These factors included liver disease, acidosis, anemia, thrombocytopenia, urinary tract infection, invasive mechanical ventilation, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores, leukocyte counts, and blood calcium levels. These factors were incorporated into the final model. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.821 for the training set and 0.845 for the validation set, indicating the model’s high accuracy in predicting sepsis. Calibration curves demonstrated good agreement between the model’s predictions and actual outcomes. Furthermore, the decision curve analysis indicated that the model offers favorable clinical utility. This study successfully developed a dynamic nomogram model for predicting the risk of secondary sepsis in ICU patients with non-traumatic cerebral hemorrhage. The model is expected to provide valuable predictive information to facilitate timely interventions by healthcare professionals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.