ArticleScientific reports2025
Concordance of HER2-low scoring in breast carcinomas among pathologists.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes differ across MammaPrint® classifications in breast cancer.Endocrine-related cancer · 2026Article
- "HER2-Low" and the Challenge of Repurposing Legacy HER2 IHC Biomarker Assays.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- The Age of Molecular Biomarkers: Cancer in the Era of Personalized Medicine. What Do Pathologists in Developing Countries Need to Know and Understand?International journal of general medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The results from DESTINY-Breast 04 and the subsequent introduction of trastuzumab-deruxtecan as a potential treatement for HER2-low breast cancer necessitated the reevaluation of HER2 scoring. The discordance in HER2 scoring reported in previous studies led us to initiate a regional ring study and to assess our data. This ring study involved 61 breast pathology experts from four countries across the Balkans region. The research comprised 20 samples, including biopsies and surgical specimens, sourced from the archives of one institution. We amassed a total of 1220 scores. The findings indicate a significant degree of interobserver agreement among pathologists in scoring individual categories (scores 0, 1+, 2+, and 3+), with even higher agreement observed when scores 1 + and 2 + were combined into a single, HER2-low category. The findings of this study indicate that adequate education, awareness regarding the therapeutic significance of the HER2-low category, and expertise in breast pathology facilitate the accurate identification of HER2-low breast cancers. These findings will promote ongoing training in breast pathology within the region and will provide a reference for subsequent research efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.