ArticleJournal of human hypertension2025
Nocturnal systolic and diastolic blood pressure across gestational periods and the risk of preeclampsia.
Article in Journal of human hypertension, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nocturnal blood pressure and the risk of preeclampsia: an overlooked link.Journal of human hypertension · 2026Review
- Does a non-dipping heart rate profile predict adverse maternal-fetal outcomes? evidence from 24-h ambulatory monitoring in the second half of high-risk pregnancies.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Article
- Further optimization of morning blood pressure assessment in high-risk pregnancy.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Article
- JHH Young Investigator Award 2025: Interview with the winner Julian Minetto.Journal of human hypertension · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To investigate the relationship between blood pressure (BP) components (daytime vs. nocturnal BP and systolic vs. diastolic BP) and preeclampsia (PE) across gestational stages. We conducted a historical cohort study involving 1363 high-risk pregnant women (mean age, 30 ± 7 years). Ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) was performed at 12-19 weeks (n = 389), 20-27 weeks (n = 798), and 28-36 weeks (n = 1176); 59.9, 25.0, and 15.1% of the participants underwent one, two, and three ABPM evaluations, respectively. PE occurred in 15.4, 18.9, and 20.2% of the women evaluated at 12-19, 20-27, and 28-36 weeks, respectively. In the second half of pregnancy, sustained (daytime and nighttime) and isolated nocturnal hypertension were strong predictors of PE. Conversely, before the 20th week of gestation, only sustained hypertension (but not isolated nocturnal hypertension) increased PE risk, with lower odds ratios (ORs). Moreover, the areas under the curve (AUCs) for all ABPM components increased markedly after the 20th week of gestation. In late pregnancy, systolic and diastolic ABPM levels as well as all forms of nocturnal hypertension (isolated systolic, isolated diastolic, and combined systodiastolic) were significantly associated with PE risk, with ORs remaining significant after adjusting for daytime ABPM and maternal covariates. Patients with systodiastolic nocturnal hypertension had the highest risk. Conversely, neither daytime hypertension nor daytime ABPM levels remained statistically significant after adjusting for nocturnal ABPM levels. In conclusion, the association between PE and systolic, diastolic, and systodiastolic nocturnal hypertension emerges in the second half of pregnancy, suggesting a relationship with abnormal placentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40634516What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.