ArticleScientific reports2025
Comparative analysis of Microsoft Kinect Azure and manual measurement methods in the sit and reach test among elite female weightlifters.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of hip and knee range of motion measurements using Azure Kinect and a digital goniometer in elite female weightlifters.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microsoft Kinect is an increasingly common tool for low-cost and portable measurement of human movements. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential reliability and reproducibility of Microsoft Kinect Azure in the sit-and-reach test conducted under standardized test conditions in a controlled training environment with elite female weightlifters. The sit-and-reach test was performed with Microsoft Kinect Azure and manual methods and also the reliability and validity were analyzed by comparing the wrist, elbow, shoulder and trunk joint angle measurements with the digital goniometer. Twenty-one healthy female weightlifter athletes who won medals in international championships were included in the study. Sit-and-reach testing was performed using Microsoft Kinect Azure and manual methods in accordance with the standards of the American College of Sports Medicine. The flexion range of motions of each athlete's wrist, elbow, shoulder and trunk joint angles were measured with a digital goniometer and Microsoft Kinect Azure. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS 25.0 and Python 3.9.12 software. Descriptive statistics were calculated for all variables, and differences between Kinect and manual methods were evaluated with the Mann-Whitney U test and Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test. Linear relationships between measurements were analyzed with Spearman correlation coefficients. Intraclass Correlation Coefficient was calculated for the concordance analysis and presented with Bland-Altman plots. The level of significance was accepted as p < 0.05. The findings suggest that Kinect Azure may provide good reproducibility and agreement with manual goniometric measurements for joint angles under the specific structured conditions tested. For parameters such as the elbow, shoulder, wrist, trunk angles and distance traveled, high ICC values (> 0.90) indicated strong consistency between the methods. Kinect Azure may serve as a reliable alternative to manual measurement methods under standardized testing conditions. Further studies are recommended to examine its generalizability to other populations and test environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.