ArticleScientific reports2025
Efficient compression of encoder-decoder models for semantic segmentation using the separation index.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- SegResDeiT: a hybrid SegNet-ResNet-50-DeiT framework for automated cervical cancer segmentation and classification.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Adaptive information-constrained mapping for feature compression in edge AI and federated systems.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Applications, image analysis, and interpretation of computer vision in medical imaging.Frontiers in radiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present a novel approach to compressing encoder-decoder architectures, particularly in semantic segmentation tasks, by leveraging the Separation Index (SI)-a metric that quantifies how distinctly a network's feature maps separate different classes at the pixel level. By identifying and pruning redundant layers and filters, our method preserves the fine-grained spatial details crucial for segmentation while significantly reducing model complexity. We evaluated our approach on five diverse datasets-CamVid (road scenes), KiTS19 (kidney tumor CT scans), the 2018 Data Science Bowl (nuclei segmentation), Aerial Imagery for remote sensing, and MVTec AD (industrial anomaly detection)-across architectures such as U-Net, LinkNet, MobileNet, DeepLabV3, and SegNet. Experimental results show that SI-driven compression reduces parameters and floating-point operations by up to 70% while maintaining or even improving segmentation accuracy, as measured by mean Intersection over Union (IoU). For example, a compressed DeepLabV3 raises the mean IoU from 0.624 to 0.638 on an aerial imagery dataset with a 2.6× reduction in parameters and faster inference. These findings highlight how SI-based pruning balances efficiency and performance, offering a practical solution for resource-constrained semantic segmentation applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.