ArticleScientific reports2025
Configuration analysis of negative silence in college classroom based on FSQCA method.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A grounded theory study in blended learning of the facilitation of role transition from compliant learners to collaborative partners regarding non-verbal behavior.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Interpersonal satisfaction and classroom silence in Chinese universities: the mediating role of social anxiety.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Evaluating the impact of an integrated KIPP and positive psychology course on university students' psychological well-being in China: a mixed-methods study.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Currently, negative silence among students in college classroom is quite common. However, existing research on this phenomenon tends to analyze the net effects of antecedent conditions on outcome. In fact, negative silence in college classroom is the result of multiple factors working together. Therefore, this paper takes 222 college students as research samples and uses FSQCA method to analyze the relationships between five antecedent conditions (self-efficacy, fear of negative evaluation, interest, verbal immediacy, and nonverbal immediacy) and negative classroom silence from the configuration perspective. The results indicate that none of these conditions is necessary for the negative silence. On the contrary, three configurations of conditions could lead to this issue. The first configuration contains self-efficacy, fear of negative evaluation, and verbal immediacy. The second configuration includes self-efficacy, fear of negative evaluation, and nonverbal immediacy. The third configuration consists of self-efficacy, interest, verbal immediacy, and nonverbal immediacy. The research results of this article reveal the related factors and their configurations of negative silence in college classroom, which can help to gain a comprehensive understanding of the reasons for the phenomenon and provide references for breaking it. For instance, in teaching and learning process, it is necessary to use methods such as encouragement and appreciation to promote the self-efficacy of college students, provide effective guidance for college students to overcome the fear of negative evaluation, combine more real-life examples with knowledge to enhance college students' learning interest, and use more verbal and nonverbal immediacy behaviors to attract the attention of college students in the classroom, so as to achieve an active and effective learning atmosphere.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.