ArticleScientific reports2025
Longitudinal analysis of brain functional connectivity and its association with clinical assessment in depressed patients using resting state fMRI.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Functional alterations of the medial frontal gyrus as candidate biomarkers for resilience in major depressive disorder.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
- Differentiating suicide risk in treatment-resistant depression: clinical and functional imaging correlates of suicidal ideation and attempt.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Suicidal ideation (SI) is an important predictor of suicide attempts, yet SI is difficult to predict. It is also important to understand the associations between network function and SI (or the absence of suicidal ideation, NS) in patients with depression. We recruited 83 participants and divided them into four groups: 25 healthy controls (HCs), 27 depressed patients without suicidal ideation (NS), 18 depressed patients with suicidal ideation (SI), and 13 depressed patients whose SI was converted to NS (improved). All subjects underwent resting-state fMRI at baseline (TP1) and one year later (TP2) after receiving therapy. Patients also underwent four clinical assessments that yielded scale scores. We used the mean amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (mfALFF) and mean regional homogeneity (mReHo) to compare the function of each brain region at TP1 and TP2. Graph theoretical analysis and network-based statistic analysis were performed to assess changes in connectivity from TP1 to TP2. Multiple regression analysis was also used to examine the association between brain function alterations and clinical assessment changes in each group. Post-treatment, significant functional activity differences were observed: in the cuneus and cingulate for NS; inferior parietal lobule and frontal regions for SI; and parahippocampus and thalamus for the improved group. Increased functional interconnections were noted among frontal, occipital, and temporal lobes. Several connectivity changes correlated with clinical assessment variations (HAM-D, HADS-A, BSS, RRS) across groups, including the caudate, precuneus, and cingulate. We deliberated on the impact of treatment on distinct cerebral regions within the NS and SI cohorts across various conditions. Within the improved group, discernible alterations in brain function following treatment amelioration were identified among the same cohort of individuals, encapsulating modifications in both pathological conditions and cerebral functionality. These findings contribute to our understanding of the neural correlates of depressive disorder and suicidal ideation and highlight the potential impact of therapeutic interventions on brain function in these populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.