ArticleScientific reports2025
Development and validation of a predictive nomogram for postoperative upper limb lymphedema in breast cancer patients: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Confronting clinical tradition: ipsilateral arm use after breast cancer surgery in Japan.Journal of anesthesia · 2026Review
- Dose to the axillary-lateral thoracic vessel junction predicts breast cancer-related lymphedema after postmastectomy radiotherapy: development and temporal validation of NTCP and nomogram models.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Nomogram for predicting risk of arm lymphedema following axillary lymph node dissection in breast cancer patients.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Upper limb lymphedema is a common and debilitating complication following breast cancer surgery. Identifying patients at high risk for developing lymphedema is crucial for early intervention and improved outcomes. This study aimed to develop and validate a predictive nomogram for estimating the risk of postoperative upper limb lymphedema in breast cancer patients. A retrospective cohort of 724 breast cancer patients who underwent radical surgery was analyzed. Of these, 211 (29.1%) developed postoperative upper limb lymphedema. Baseline characteristics, including demographic, clinical, and treatment-related factors, were compared between patients with and without lymphedema. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify independent risk factors. A nomogram was then constructed using the significant predictors. The performance of the nomogram was evaluated through the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and calibration curve analysis. In the multivariate analysis, age, body mass index (BMI), education level, hypertension, TNM stage, menopausal status, marital status, tumor diameter, number of lymph nodes dissected, postoperative radiotherapy, postoperative complications, and functional exercise were identified as independent predictors of lymphedema. The nomogram demonstrated excellent discrimination, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.944 (95% CI 0.926-0.962). The calibration curve showed good agreement between predicted and observed probabilities, indicating the model's reliability and accuracy. This study successfully developed a predictive nomogram for estimating the risk of postoperative upper limb lymphedema in breast cancer patients. The nomogram demonstrated strong predictive performance and calibration, making it a valuable tool for clinicians to identify high-risk patients and guide early interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.