Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40634488›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Implementing and evaluating the quality 4.0 PMQ framework for process monitoring in automotive manufacturing.

Fathy Alkhatib, Mohamed Allam, Vikas Swarnakar, Juman Alsadi, Maher Maalouf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fathy AlkhatibDepartment of Management Science and Engineering, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi, 127781, United Arab Emirates.
Mohamed AllamDepartment of Management Science and Engineering, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi, 127781, United Arab Emirates.
Vikas SwarnakarDepartment of Management Science and Engineering, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi, 127781, United Arab Emirates. vikas.swarnakar@ku.ac.ae.
Juman AlsadiDepartment of Management Science and Engineering, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi, 127781, United Arab Emirates.
Maher MaaloufDepartment of Management Science and Engineering, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi, 127781, United Arab Emirates.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study presents an applied integration of machine learning (ML) within the Process Monitoring for Quality (PMQ) framework to address persistent limitations in traditional quality control systems, particularly their inability to manage high-dimensional and real-time manufacturing data. This research enhances the PMQ framework with a novel Validate phase that introduces human oversight and interpretability into the ML decision-making loop. The modified framework has been implemented in a high-precision automotive component facility. The study relied on various ML algorithms, such as Decision Trees (DT), Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), to classify and predict defects in engine valves during manufacturing processes. The findings highlighted that GBM and RF provided the best performance, achieving an F1 score of 0.98 and an AUC of 0.99. Feature importance analyzes identified seat height and undercut diameter as key predictors, reinforcing the relevance of interpretable ML in industrial quality management. Beyond technical accuracy, this work demonstrates how structured human-machine collaboration can foster trust in AI-driven quality control, offering a scalable blueprint for Quality 4.0 adoption. The findings contribute to academic literature and industrial practice by bridging conceptual frameworks and real-world implementation strategies for AI-enhanced quality assurance.

Indexed as

Industry 4.0Machine learningManufacturing process optimizationPredictive maintenanceProcess monitoring for quality frameworkQuality 4.0

Identifiers

PMID40634488
PMCPMC12241642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.