Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40634487›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2025

Cerebellar and subcortical contributions to working memory manipulation.

Joshua B Tan, Isabella F Orlando, Christopher Whyte, Annie G Bryant, Brandon R Munn, Giulia Baracchini, Maedbh King, Claire O'Callaghan, Eli J Müller, James M Shine

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Joshua B TanBrain and Mind Centre, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-6013-7883
Isabella F OrlandoBrain and Mind Centre, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-4515-3479
Christopher WhyteBrain and Mind Centre, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4627-0503
Annie G BryantBrain and Mind Centre, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2217-6520
Brandon R MunnBrain and Mind Centre, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3638-1605
Giulia BaracchiniBrain and Mind Centre, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Maedbh KingDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Claire O'CallaghanBrain and Mind Centre, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5698-6364
Eli J MüllerBrain and Mind Centre, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2497-0194
James M ShineBrain and Mind Centre, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. mac.shine@sydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1762-5499

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Working memory is critical for manipulating and temporarily storing information during cognitive tasks such as problem-solving. Most models focus primarily on cortical-cortical interactions, neglecting subcortical and cerebellar contributions. Given the extensive connectivity between the cerebellum, subcortex, and cortex, we hypothesize that they contribute distinct, yet complementary, functions during working memory manipulation. To test this, we used functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) to measure blood oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) activity while participants performed a mental rotation task. Our results revealed a distributed network spanning the cortex, subcortex, and cerebellum that differentiates rotated from non-rotated stimuli and correct from incorrect responses. Notably, delayed responses in premotor, subcortical, and cerebellar regions during incorrect trials, suggest that their precise recruitment is crucial for successful working memory manipulation. These findings expand current models of working memory manipulation, revealing the collaborative role of subcortical and cerebellar regions in coordinating higher cognitive functions.

Indexed as

CerebellumMemory, Short-TermAdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40634487
PMCPMC12241541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.