ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2025
Revising the reproductive story: psychosocial and reproductive impacts 12 months after reproductive genetic carrier screening.
Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Genomic medicine in full bloom: a summer farewell issue.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The responsible implementation of reproductive genetic carrier screening (RGCS) involves understanding the long-term psychosocial and reproductive impacts of results. This mixed-methods study examined these impacts within 'Mackenzie's Mission', an Australia-wide study that offered couple-based RGCS for >1280 genes to 10,000 reproductive couples. Data from participant surveys completed at enrolment and 12 months post-result were analysed. Participants with an increased chance result were interviewed. Reflexive thematic analysis, guided by Interpretive Description was used. 4948 participants (27% response) completed the 12 month post-result survey. Most had minimal decision regret (median ≤5, 0 = no regret, 100 = high regret) and high reproductive confidence. Participants found to have an increased chance result had elevated anxiety (n = 116, median = 39 out of 80, clinically meaningful is ≥40). Interviewees (N = 19, from 16 couples) felt their increased chance result "change[d] everything" about their reproductive plans. Although revising their reproductive plan was an emotionally complex "journey", participants were "grateful" for the information. The concept of the 'Reproductive Story', was used to interpret the results. A reproductive story refers to a person's expected narrative about parenthood that, if altered, can cause psychosocial distress. Receiving an increased chance result disrupts the reproductive story. By 12 months post-result, most people with an increased chance result felt empowered to revise their reproductive story, but anxiety was elevated. Findings suggest a need for longitudinal models of post-RGCS psychosocial support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.