ArticleScientific reports2025
Determining the origin of genome aberrations improves the positive predictive value of NIPT for 22q11.2 deletion syndrome.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Clinical Implications and Limitations of Noninvasive Prenatal Testing for Detecting Fetal Copy Number Variations: A Multicenter Study in Shaanxi Province, China.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Observational
- Analysis of Prenatal Diagnosis and Pregnancy Decisions of 767 Singleton Pregnancies With Positive Prenatal Cell-Free DNA Screening Results in Southwest China.Journal of pregnancy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has been endorsed by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics as the preferred method for screening fetal 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2 DS). Maternal genomic aberrations represent a significant source of false positives in NIPT, and there are currently no solutions that effectively address this challenge. We have devised an innovative NIPT bioinformatics pipeline designed to discern the origins of copy number variations (CNVs). Then, we recruited a cohort of 39cases of 22q11.2 DS to validate the effectiveness of our methodology. Follow-up tests including amniocentesis and genome sequencing of maternal leukocytes were conducted. Leveraging a dataset of over 900 CNVs, we developed a new pipeline that classifies CNVs into those of fetal, maternal, and maternal-fetal origin based on NIPT data. The use of our pipeline led to a notable increase in the positive predictive value of NIPT for detecting 22q11.2 DS from 87% (34/39) to 94% (34/36). Furthermore, our approach has the potential to reduce the number of invasive tests by 8% (3/39). Our innovative and reliable bioinformatics pipeline has enabled the accurate differentiation of CNV origin into fetal, maternal, and maternal-fetal categories. Incorporating this pipeline into the analytical workflow could reduce false positives in NIPT results and minimize the need for invasive prenatal diagnoses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.