Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40634428›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Machine learning models for predicting multimorbidity trajectories in middle-aged and elderly adults.

Li Yao, Qiaoxing Li, Zihan Zhou, Jiajia Yin, Tingrui Wang, Yan Liu, Qinqin Li, Lu Xiao, Dongliang Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Li YaoSchool of Management and Collaborative Innovation Laboratory of Digital Transformation and Governance, Guizhou University, Guiyang, 550025, Guizhou, China.
Qiaoxing LiSchool of Management and Collaborative Innovation Laboratory of Digital Transformation and Governance, Guizhou University, Guiyang, 550025, Guizhou, China. qxli@gzu.edu.cn.
Zihan ZhouSchool of Nursing, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, 550025, Guizhou, China.
Jiajia YinSchool of Nursing, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, 550025, Guizhou, China.
Tingrui WangSchool of Nursing, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, 550025, Guizhou, China.
Yan LiuSchool of Nursing, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, 550025, Guizhou, China.
Qinqin LiSchool of Nursing, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, 550025, Guizhou, China.
Lu XiaoSchool of Tourism Management, Guizhou University of Commerce, Guiyang, 550014, China.
Dongliang YangCangzhou Medical College, Cangzhou, 061001, Hebei, China.

Funding

Humanities and Social Sciences Research Project of Guizhou University, 2024 Digital Transformation and Governance Collaborative Innovation Laboratory Special Project GDJD202401Key Special Project of the Research Base and Think Tank of Guizhou University GDZX2021030National Natural Science Foundation of China 72261005Nursing Evidence-Based Project of the Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University gyfyhlxz-2022-3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multimorbidity has emerged as a significant public health issue in the context of global population aging. Predicting and managing the progression of multimorbidity in the elderly population is crucial. This study aims to develop predictive models for multimorbidity trajectories in middle-aged and elderly populations and to identify the key factors influencing the progression of multimorbidity. First, a time-series clustering method was used to construct the multimorbidity trajectories. Then, predictive models based on machine learning techniques were developed to forecast the progression of different trajectories and identify key risk factors. This study utilized data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) database, including 12,198 middle-aged and elderly individuals (aged 45 and above). Four distinct multimorbidity progression patterns were identified: Stable Low-Risk Group (45.26%), Progressively Worsening Group (14.35%), Moderate Stability Group (31.90%) and Consistently Deteriorating Group (8.49%). Among the predictive models, the XGBoost model achieved the best performance, with an accuracy of 0.664 (95%CI: 0.648-0.681), a macro ROC-AUC of 0.825 (95%CI: 0.816-0.834), a micro ROC-AUC of 0.884 (95%CI: 0.876-0.892), and a log loss of 0.806 (95%CI: 0.781-0.831). Other models, including Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, Logistic Regression, and Artificial Neural Networks, showed similar accuracy and ROC-AUC values. The study identified three key factors-baseline disease counts, self-rated Activities of Daily Living (ADL), and self-rated health status-as critical predictors of multimorbidity trajectories.

Indexed as

Machine LearningMultimorbidityAgedAged, 80 and overChinaFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsROC CurveMultimorbidityPrediction modelTrajectory

Identifiers

PMID40634428
PMCPMC12241554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.